Home » Andy Murray News You are browsing entries filed in “Andy Murray News”

Andy Murray misses Davis Cup tie with Slovakia to rest after Australia


• Murray lost five-set semi-final at Australian Open
• ‘I’m gutted to miss out on the Davis Cup,’ Scot says

Andy Murray has pulled out of the Great Britain team for their Davis Cup tie against Slovakia in February.

Murray has had a fine start to the year, winning the Brisbane tournament and losing in five sets to Novak Djokovic in the Australian Open semi-finals, but has been advised to rest on medical grounds.

He said: “I’ve been told to take a few weeks off after picking up a few minor injuries in Australia. I’m gutted to miss out on the Davis Cup having really enjoyed playing last year, but as it’s only the start of an important season, which includes the Olympics in London, it’s probably a sensible decision.

“My focus in 2012 is on performing well in the Grand Slams and the London 2012 Olympics. I look forward to playing in the next Davis Cup tie later in the year.”

This will be Great Britain’s first tie in the Euro/Africa Zone Group I since clinching promotion with victory over Hungary last year.

Leon Smith, the captain for the tie in Glasgow from 10-12 February, has named a team of James Ward, Dan Evans, Colin Fleming and Ross Hutchins.

guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

February 1 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »

Novak Djokovic has raised the bar – will rivals react or fade away? | Kevin Mitchell


Serb’s Australian Open triumph lays down the gauntlet again to Rafael Nadal, Roger Federer and Andy Murray to respond

The growing perception that Novak Djokovic is in the vanguard of a new era in men’s tennis was strengthened in a final of almost unbearable drama but there is one old soldier not prepared to put his rifle away just yet.

When Djokovic beat Rafael Nadal, who is still only 13 months older than him, for the seventh time in a row to keep his Australian Open title, it was tempting to conclude that such domination might leave the Spaniard a desolate man, doomed to more nights of rollercoaster disappointment. He does not see it that way, and rightly so. His body aches; his spirit roars.

He admitted recently that Djokovic had got inside his head; in splendid defeat he has got that monkey off his back.

While Djokovic, on the statistical face of it, owns Nadal as Nadal has sometimes owned Roger Federer, there was little evidence in the closing acts of one of the best Australian Open finals ever that Rafa was Novak’s bunny any more. And that is why Nadal leaves Melbourne happier than his wrecked on-court mien suggested after their record five hours and 53 minutes saga.

Where does Federer stand now? He has played some sublime tennis over the past six months but won the last of his 16 grand slam titles two years ago, here against Murray. He might come again. But where? Not in Paris. Probably not at Wimbledon. Maybe at Flushing Meadows. And will he be around after the Olympics? Maybe not.

Still there is no denying who the boss is now and for the immediate future. The world No1 should have a plus sign next to that ranking because he has again edged away from Nadal and Federer, as well as Andy Murray, the world No4 whom he beat in a fantastic semi-final over five sets on Friday night.

Fittingly there were nearly as many stars in the stadium on Sunday night as in the skies above to witness a wonderful final: Margaret Court, Mark Edmondson (their last champion here), Frank Sedgman, Neale Fraser, Mervyn Rose, Bill Bowrey, Roy Emerson, Ken Rosewall and the greatest of them all, Rod Laver, a guest in his eponymous cathedral.

After a distracted performance in an arena that resembled a dentist’s waiting room in the first set and the Colosseum in the fifth Djokovic beat Nadal 5-7, 6-4, 6-2, 6-7, 7-5. It was as long as it was brutal as it was magnificent.

How good is Djokovic? After suspicions earlier in his career that he was quicker to quit or moan than fight he has become a formidable gladiator.

In their three defining clashes in majors last year Djokovic was too good for Nadal at Wimbledon, had a tougher time in New York but ultimately was stronger in the shot and here met a markedly rejuvenated foe.

Murray, too, can take heart from the fact that, while Nadal is hunting down Djokovic to the very limits of his physical, tactical and mental capacity in title deciders, he is a more serious threat than he was – significantly so compared with the dispiriting defeat here last year.

Murray got tantalisingly close to Djokovic on Friday night, as he did in Rome (his win over him in Cincinnati came via an injury retirement), and is encouraged in the belief that there is not a lot between them. Well, in one crucial respect there is: five grand slam titles. Until he wins one – in all likelihood by beating the man himself – Murray will have to look up the mountain rather than across the summit alongside his old friend. He is not far away but getting there has not become any easier.

What Murray can draw from Djokovic is the inspiration to get the last drop out of his talent. If that is good enough to win a grand slam title, he and a nation will be delighted. If it is not, so be it. Nobody has a right to victory – as Nadal would no doubt tell him.

guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

January 30 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »

Andy Murray believes he can fulfil his grand ambition to be world No1


The Briton has survived his agonising Australian Open semi-final defeat with his spirit and high ideals intact

In the moments of his deepest frustration, not long after losing to Novak Djokovic in the semi-final of the Australian Open, Andy Murray sounded his most bullish. “I want to get to No1,” he said before disappearing into the labyrinth of the main stadium at Melbourne Park for a drugs test he could have done without at such a late hour. “That’s one of my goals this year and I’ll try my best to do it.”

The incumbent, who had just beaten him in five sets, plays the No2, Rafael Nadal, in the final, while the No3, Roger Federer, left town without ceremony after losing to Nadal in the other semi-final. These are Murray’s peers, where he belongs at 24, although he would like to mix up the order.

Although his committed struggle against Djokovic left him playing gooseberry again, to embrace the sunny days ahead did not seem such a bad journey for the Scot to contemplate. He survived with his spirit intact and talked later as if this were a starting point rather than a setback. It was not always so.

Defeat hits him in different ways. Against unranked players not really on his radar – such as Donald Young and Alex Bogomolov, both gasping for acceptance outside the top 100 when they shocked him in quick, sharp upsets after his Australian Open fiasco last year – losing is incomprehensible to Murray. It makes no sense. But failing to beat players he considers his equals is different. While he does not fear them, he envies them, because they have something he wants and, as yet, cannot have. They all have their grand slam trophies, proof of their pedigree. Murray has none.

But this time, he had things to be proud of. “You’re always going to have people that doubt me and say: ‘He’s not that good,’ ‘He’s not as good as them,’” he said. “I’m aware that I still need to prove some things and win the match like tonight. It was so close. But I need to make that last little jump and I’m much closer than I was at this stage last year.

“I don’t know how much [Djokovic] can keep improving but he’s played great tennis the whole of last year, made a big improvement, and I think now I’ve started to improve and I think it’s because of those guys that I’m playing as well as I am.”

And he is playing as well as ever – at this level. Last year, he hit heights of inspired stroke play of which few players are capable, certainly not Andy Roddick, who screamed in frustration when being embarrassed during the semi-final at Queen’s: “Keep it social!” Jo-Wilfried Tsonga fared little better in the rain-delayed final. There were good wins, too, in a hat-trick in Asia before the ATP World Tour Finals in London, where he broke down. This, though, was a slam, one he reckoned he could win, whoever was on the other side of the net. He lost graciously, but it did hurt.

“In four or five days’ time we [his training team, including new coach Ivan Lendl] will have a good chat about the match and the last few weeks and I’m sure I won’t be as disappointed as I am just now,” he said. “I’ve got to try as best as possible to take all the positives from it, see the things I need to work on. If I don’t feel like I can improve that’s when things are going to go badly and I think that I can still.”

The one victory his detractors cannot take away from him is the one he had over himself. There was only the flicker of annoyance in the first set, when seagulls distracted him and, after he had used all his challenges in the fifth set, he was resigned to the eye of the line officials and the authority of the chair umpire. As it happens, they did not let him or Djokovic down. Murray praised them for their competence later, a rare compliment for the officials in this tournament.

All round, he looked and sounded more settled. He had at least shrugged the temper monkey off his back for the moment, and that could be put down to Lendl’s influence. If he has brought anything to the Murray cause, it has been calm.

Would he return to his training base in Florida, the state in which Lendl lives? “I was going to go there 10 days before Dubai or something because there’s no point practising in cold, indoors. I need to practise in the warm weather, I don’t want to be practising indoors, so as soon as I can I’ll go over to Miami and start working.”

guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

January 29 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »

Australian Open 2012 diary: online spite for Andy Murray despite heroics | Kevin Mitchell


Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but those who say Andy Murray choked against Novak Djokovic are being harsh

Even allowing for the idiocy that occasionally infects the blogosphere, the spite showered on Andy Murray for losing a five-set semi-final at a grand slam to the best player in the world was as uninformed as it was predictable as it was pathetic.

Whose opinion carries more weight: Novak Djokovic, who actually played in the match and said after four hours and 50 minutes of mutual hell on court with Murray: “Andy deserved the credit to come back after 2-5 down [in the fifth set],” or @hidingbehindstupidname who said: “skottish w**ker got no borllz choker lol!! #anyonebutmurray”?

The first is a real quote, of course, the second a conflation of contributions by the keyboard illiterati who indulge their prejudices without regard for spelling, taste or logic. What is the matter with these people? Are they the same heroes who shout abuse in football stadiums from the safety of the pack or a new breed of bedroom-bound saddos with no lives but the ones they lead through others?

A few critics were tempted to share the view that Murray blew it, but that is harsh. They are entitled to their opinions, of course – as is @Imanidiotwithnolife, and who is to say my view is the right one? But let’s look at some of what happened in that supposed fifth-set choke: Coming off the Djokovic blitz of the fourth set, Murray looked gone. It surely would be over quickly, was the consensus.

He had to save three break points to hold at 2-2, hitting an ace and a double fault before finishing with a big serve down the T. He was suffering.

Djokovic held to love. It looked worse. Murray on serve used his final challenge, then was broken by a resurgent Djokovic. It was now grim.

The end looked near – but Murray held to trail 3-5 and broke Djokovic to love for 4-5, holding again to level. Things were looking up. Djokovic had to save three break points to hold for 6-5. The momentum was with Murray.

Then, serving to stay in the match, Murray was helpless on spent legs to save two match points against a resurgent champion, and it was done.

Some choke.

Arrivederci

An Italian tennis journalist caught filming in a restricted are on the Melbourne Park site, including the players’ lounge, paid for it by being thrown out of the tournament moments before the second semi-final. He said he was unaware he was doing anything wrong.

Rights issues get more complex by the day in sport, although Wimbledon have finally relented and will allow writers from websites to cover this year’s tournament.

Here comes the hyphen

Josh Ward-Hibbert has finally broken cover. The Nottingham teenager was little discussed until he stormed through the boys’ singles, knocking over the eighth and ninth seeds before going out in the quarters to the Canadian Filip Peliwo – who went on to lose in Saturday’s final to the very good Australian Luke Saville, now a two-time winner here.

Ward-Hibbert, 6ft 4in with a booming serve and as-yet untamed forehand and a delightful single-handed backhand, looks to have the tools to make it as a professional. One seasoned Brit-prospect-watcher (a thankless task) said: “He has everything. He is built like Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, is a great athlete and plays with such energy and power.”

Another reason you might notice the personable young man with the big game and easy smile is he is one of the few black juniors coming through.

On Friday, he made up for his disappointment in the singles by teaming up with the better-known Liam Broady to win the boys’ doubles title. Seeded six, they won comfortably, 6-3, 6-2 in 44 minutes, against Filip Veger and Adam Pavlasek. (The Czech Pavlasek has an older girlfriend: the Wimbledon champion Petra Kvitova.)

Ward-Hibbert is still an innocent in an exciting world, undecided whether to go on the Tour this summer or go to college in the United States later in the year. He will decide in March.

“I’m 18, come from Nottingham. I have been training in Spain [at the Sotogrande academy on the Costa del Sol, run by the former British doubles No1 Dan Kiernan]. I try to play aggressively. That’s the only way I’m going to be able to go far in the game. I started with a single-handed backhand, I guess it’s just habit and I work on it the best I can.”

It is his serving that most easily catches the eye. “At Wimbledon, I got the junior record with 131 miles an hour. Pretty quick.

“I started at the Nottingham tennis centre, when I was about 13. I went to Spain when I was about 14 and I am at Soto full time. It’s fantastic. I played a bit of basketball when I was younger but tennis was always my first sport. I was just better at it.

“I am trying to keep my options open, don’t want to close any door. There’s a chance I might be going into the American college system. It’s a chance to get some great coaching. After four years there, I would then come out of that and go on Tour. But I will see how it goes. I’m going to make a decision around March or a bit later. It starts in September this year.

Obviously there’s school involved but, for me, it’s about improving my game over four years. I don’t have a game that’s going to peak at a younger age, so I’ve got to be patient. It would be easier on my parents, financially, too – and a high level of tennis.”

For now, it’s back to Nottingham to see his family (the hyphen comes from his mother and father, who kept their surnames). “Neither of them plays. My brother, Matthew, started and that’s how I got into it. Not many hyphens on the tennis circuit. Hopefully, there will be one soon.

“I am out a lot but I try to get home as much as I can. It’s tough, but I don’t get too homesick when I’m away for a long time.

“When I was a kid, I loved to see Federer play – Monfils and Tsonga too. Great entertainers. But I also like how Berdych plays, kind of big. He knows what he can do. I’ve walked by Federer a few times [here]. Tried to get eye contact. Got a little smile, but he didn’t really recognise me. Maybe some day he will. Hopefully on the other side of the net.”

guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

January 28 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »

Novak Djokovic beats Andy Murray to reach Australian Open final


• Djokovic outlasts Murray to win 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 7-5
• Serb will face Rafael Nadal in Sunday’s final
In pictures: the best images of the semi-final

There was a slew of broken serves, as in any worthwhile struggle, and one broken heart on Rod Laver Arena as the clock slipped way past midnight. As a year ago it again belonged to Andy Murray. This time, though, it will be considerably easier to put back together.

In his longest ever match at 10 minutes short of five hours, and one of the truly stirring tennis fights – of this Australian Open, this week or this era – Murray lost once more to the player who can fairly lay claim to being the best in the world, Novak Djokovic, who beat him so completely in the 2011 final.

It would be unfair – daft, even, and demeaning to the winner – to suggest Murray threw the match away after coming back from 2-5 in the fifth set and failing to convert any of three break points that would have left him serving for the match. This was tightrope tennis. Either man could have fallen off. Neither choked and the Serb deserved to hang on under the most intense pressure.

So the sceptics can park that prejudice out of the way. Murray left with his head held high. When Djokovic hit the winning forehand, neither had anything left to give. He won 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 7-5 in a semi-final that surpassed even the drama and excellence of the one on Thursday night, when Rafael Nadal beat Roger Federer. Djokovic, for the third straight major, plays Nadal in Sunday’s final.

Murray was shattered. But he has much to take away from a defeat that was almost a victory. And, while it was difficult to detect emotion on the weathered face of his new coach, Ivan Lendl, the Czech was surely proud. Murray revealed later: “[Lendl] told me a couple of nights ago, ‘You’ll win but you’re going to have to go through a lot of pain to get there, so prepare yourself mentally for that. There will be a lot of tough points to play when your legs are sore and your legs are burning.’”

He got the result wrong but the narrative right. Last January Djokovic won ruthlessly in three one-sided sets and so injured the Scot’s spirit it was months before he recovered (although he sees it differently in hindsight). This was so much longer and bloodier – and that is why Murray should leave Melbourne with hope rather than disappointment alone.

After time to reflect he said: “Everyone sees this match or the tournament but there’s so much more that goes into it: I’ve been away for two months. I prepared as well as I could, I played probably as well as I could and did all the right things – so I can’t be disappointed.”

Murray is growing as a player and a human being thrown into the bearpit his talent ensured would be his lot in life. If anything, he is better set to win a grand slam title because of this defeat than by reaching his three major finals. He played way above the levels of those encounters, for a start. He is a worthy contemporary of three of the finest players in tennis. His mission is still to beat one of them in the final of a major and there is no shirking the effort that will take.

Last year, after Djokovic wiped the court with him, he said he wanted to get away from tennis, his obsession since the age of 10, to walk the dog, get some other sort of life for awhile. “I might not play for three months,” he said. He was back a few weeks later but it took months for him to find his game again.

On Friday night he was in calmer mood, despite aching limbs and bruised pride. “I’ve always liked being on the court, I never like just putting the rackets away for two and a half, three weeks. I always try to keep myself active in some way. I’ll definitely take five, six days off and then start hitting again. Hopefully the body’s OK but the last two months have been tough physically and I had some niggles, coming into the tournament so I need to get them better.”

That is the talk Lendl will want to hear. A year ago, Murray was the boss. He is still paying the freight but his coach is more like a partner.

This was a match that dipped and soared. Murray struggled early and a blowout seemed possible; he recovered well in the second set as the level rose, out-toughed Djokovic in a competitive third, was blasted out in the fourth, which took a mere 25 minutes, and then they set themselves on drained legs for the fight in the fifth.

“Andy deserved the credit to come back after 2-5 down,” Djokovic said. “He was really fighting. Not much words to describe the feeling I have now. It was a physical match. It was one of the best matches I played. Emotional and mentally it was difficult too. We were breaking each other’s serve easier than holding. It was a very even match, from the first to the last point.”

The highlights reel would be far longer than that of the lowlights. Djokovic hit 184 winners to 161 and Murray’s error count was higher at 86 to 69 – but those are just numbers. Murray changed his shirt but not his gameplan in the deciding fifth. He tried to stretch Djokovic but his legs were sapped. It was the Serb, previously spent, who now pulled the strings.

There were two crucial games early in the set. The first was during Djokovic’s serve at 1-1, a literally breathtaking 25-shot rally in which Murray ran Djokovic ragged to get to 30-30. The Serb held but he got the unmistakable message the fight was back on. The second was the next game, in which Murray’s clutch ace saved the first of three break points and he drew level at 2-2. Djokovic held to love and, as they entered a new day, Murray emitted a scream when he went 30-40 down after cruising on his serve. Djokovic, though, blew a cross-court forehand for deuce – but not the forehand he drilled for a winner and break.

Murray hung on like a starving dog, winning a 26-shot rally (the average for the match was 6.2), then had Djokovic 0-30 on his serve with the prize in sight. A huge forehand clipped the baseline and the prime minister – booed earlier by the well-oiled punters – shook her head in disbelief. Nobody booed her now. They were entranced, especially when Murray came to the net to hit the winner.

They would have screamed the place down had he taken any of the three break points in the 10th game but Djokovic showed immense courage with high-risk shots to hold. Murray served to stay in the match but could not quite manage it.

Murray years ago settled on a quote from a thinker he had not heard of, the American journalist Herbert Bayard Swope, as his guiding philosophy: “I cannot give you the formula for success but I can give you the formula for failure – which is: try to please everybody.” In one of his bravest defeats he left nobody displeased.

guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

January 27 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »

Novak Djokovic braced for another physical battle against Rafael Nadal


The Serb’s epic semi-final against Andy Murray left him breathless but he will need no motivation in the final

Andy Murray sent his old friend Novak Djokovic on his way into the final of the 2012 Australian against Rafael Nadal on Sunday with a bit of Caledonian whimsy when he predicted: “He’ll be tired, that’s for sure.”

After four hours and 50 minutes of unadulterated effort in a semi-final that stretched way past midnight on the Rod Laver Arena it was a singularly appropriate observation by the courageous loser. If the Serb beats the Spaniard in their third consecutive grand slam final, it will be despite rather than because of his five-set victory over Murray.

At points even before halfway Djokovic was gasping for breath, as he had been when beating David Ferrer in the quarter-finals on Wednesday, and looked “gone for all money”, as they say here. Of course, he was not. The strength flooded back into his legs as the prospect of defeat drowned out tiredness and both men left the court drained but content that they had done their job. It will be no different on Sunday. This is their painful calling, one that pays handsomely but one to which they are nonetheless addicted, for good or bad, win or lose.

“There is no secret it is going to be physical again,” Djokovic said. “I will do my best to recover. I have a day and a half. I will try to get as much sleep [as possible] and my recovery programme under way and hope for the best. That’s going to be crucial, for me to recover and to be able to perform my best, because Rafa is fit. He’s been playing well. He had an extra day. He definitely wants to win this title.”

All of that might be stating the blindingly obvious but it is no less true for that. Nadal, who complained of a mysterious jabbing pain to his right knee early in the tournament, has played six matches with it strapped, yet shown no obvious discomfort, even in his firefight with Roger Federer in the first semi-final.

That match revealed, too, the world No2′s hunger after a 2011 campaign in which Djokovic beat him six times – all in finals, two of them in grand slam events. This will be their third straight showdown for a major title.

Djokovic was realistic about his task. “We all have different bodies that require more or less time to recover, so I can’t really compare that to him. But I have been in similar situations, let’s say, where I had the long matches and I’m supposed to play soon after. For example, a couple years back with Roger I had a very long match, and then the next day I was supposed to play finals. We are familiar with these kind of conditions and situations.”

It is just this scenario that tipped the players into near revolt here, as they seek to rearrange schedules, workloads and the demands of two-week tournaments. It is not so bad here as the ridiculously back-ended US Open, where they played every day right up to the end of the concluding week.

Then Djokovic wore down Nadal in an excellent final after that outrageous win in the semi-finals over a devastated Federer.

His semi-final against Murray was, if anything, tougher, although Djokovic says, “I had a couple matches in New York against Roger in the last couple years which can be compared to this one. But time-wise, I think this was one of the longest, if not the longest, that I’ve played in the later stages of a grand slam.

“I have to be satisfied. I have to be happy. As a tennis player you practise hard every single day knowing that you will get an opportunity to be part of such a great match and on such a high level.

“I will try to get as much sleep as I can. I don’t think I’ll practise much. I had enough time on the court tonight.”

Can he do it? Certainly. For all that the match hurt him physically, it surely has buoyed him mentally – and that, against Nadal, is nearly as important.

Three out of the past four years here the winner of the second semi-final has won the final, testimony at least to the considerable resilience of the modern athlete. If they can produce a final anywhere near the quality of the two matches that got them there, we are in for another memorable night.

Djokovic’s brilliant year against Nadal

Novak Djokovic trails 16-13 in overall head to head games against Rafael Nadal but in 2011 he won all six finals the pair contested. Here is how he did it. Research by Alistair Hendrie

US Open Final 13 September 2011

Djokovic wins 6-2 6-4 6-7 (3-7) 6-1

Djokovic launched an all-out attack on Nadal to secure his third grand slam title of 2011. Such was the ferocity of the Serb’s shots that Nadal was often rocked back on the baseline, where he found it difficult to mount attacks of his own. Nadal’s serve also let him down – he was broken 11 times by Djokovic during the match.

Wimbledon Final 3 July 2011

Djokovic wins 6-4, 6-1, 1-6, 6-3

Djokovic became the first Serb to win Wimbledon, inflicting Nadal’s first defeat at the tournament in four years. It was an enthralling final but the quality of play often dipped and both players came close to losing a set to love. Djokovic worked Nadal over on his backhand, forcing the Spaniard wide to keep him away from his rasping forehand.

Rome Final 15 May 2011

Djokovic wins 6-4, 6-4

Djokovic stretched his unbeaten run to 39 but the toll of so many matches began to tell in the first set and the Serb looked fatigued. Luckily for him, errors crept into Nadal’s game too and Djokovic became more fluent as he sensed his opponent’s hesitancy.

Madrid Final 8 May 2011

Djokovic wins 7-5, 6-4

Djokovic described this absorbing victory as “unbelievable”, and his enthusiasm was understandable considering this was Nadal’s first loss on clay in two years. Seemingly feeling the pressure, Djokovic lost an imposing 5-3 lead in the first set but managed to escape Nadal’s clutches. He then ground out a brutal second set to beat his rival again.

Miami Final 3 April 2011

Djokovic wins 4-6, 6-3, 7-6 (7-4)

Djokovic struggled with windy conditions as he lost the opener to Nadal, who was at his brutal best. Djokovic decided to play more defensively as the match progressed and it proved successful as he worked Nadal round the court. Both men raised their levels in the third set. Nadal, however, stuttered in the tie-breaker. His early double-fault proved terminal to his hopes.

Indian Wells Final 20 March 2011

Djokovic wins 4-6, 6-3, 6-2

With this thrilling victory, Djokovic defeated Nadal in a final for the first time in six attempts. The match was filled with both exhilarating rallies and inexplicable miscues, yet Djokovic’s serve grew stronger as the match progressed and he surged to victory after losing a tight first set.

guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

January 27 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »

Australian Open 2012: Andy Murray v Novak Djokovic – in pictures


All the best images from Melbourne as Andy Murray faces Novak Djokovic for a place in the Australian Open final

January 27 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »

Novak Djokovic v Andy Murray – as it happened | Jacob Steinberg


Novak Djokovic beat Andy Murray in an epic semi-final, winning 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 7-5 to reach the final

“Kids, you tried and you failed. The lesson is never try” – Homer Simpson.

Andy Murray could be forgiven if he was contemplating adopting this policy. He finds himself having to create his own history at the same time that the three players ahead of him have been busy rewriting the record books every time they turn up at a grand slam, and the same old story is getting a little tired now. This is his fifth semi-final in a row at a major tournament; the likeliest outcome is that Novak Djokovic, the world No1 and favourite, will hand him a fourth defeat in a row. It is Murray’s misfortune to be playing at a time when the standard at the top of the men’s game has never reached such stratospheric heights before, when being outrageously talented isn’t enough at the business end of a slam, you have to be a genius – and maintain that level for five sets. We saw as much when Roger Federer lost to Rafael Nadal yesterday. The Swiss legend was imperious for much of the first set, but the Spaniard, despite being below his terrifying best, pounced as soon as he glimpsed a way back into the match.

Murray is outrageously talented: this is obvious to all but a few dullards who perpetuate the clueless line that he is surly, a brat, a poor loser, a loser. Here’s a player we should be proud of, who’s reached the final of the Australian Open and the US Open and the last four of every slam. He’s No4 in the world. The fourth best at what he does in the world, words that should be hammered, preferably using a large mallet, into the head of every numbskull around who labels him a bottle-job for losing a final. The supposed acts of bottle-jobbery have come in finals against arguably the greatest player of all time, semi-finals against an improbable force of nature who beats the greatest player of all time every time they play and a final against the man on the other side of the net this morning. Djokovic isn’t bad – he only won 70 matches out of 76 in 2011, winning three grand slams along the way.

Djokovic’s first came against Murray in Melbourne last year, when he administered a death-by-1000-paper-cuts thrashing that seemed to go so quickly, it was more reminiscent of going to the doctor to have an injection. All the build-up, all the hype, all the fretting about the needle and before you know it, it’s done without you even noticing. The tennis match started and then the tennis match ended and Djokovic was off to collect his winnings, Murray left in a helpless daze.

The general consensus is that Murray’s problem is not so much in his hands but in his head, and he’ll have to put that defeat out of his mind if he is to stand any chance of causing an upset. To his credit, under the tutelage of Ivan Lendl, the on-court tantrums seem to have abated over the last fortnight, though that is partly down to a rather favourable path through. He avoided matches against Gael Monfils and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, while Mikhail Kukushkin retired in the fourth round and Kei Nishikori ran out of juice in the quarters. The real test comes now, though he will be encouraged by the way Djokovic was huffing, puffing and feeling his injured thigh during his quarter-final against David Ferrer. Then again, he did win.

Head-to-head record: For two players who grew up together, they have met only once in a grand slam – the aforementioned Australian Open final last year. Overall Djokovic leads 6-4 and Murray won their last encounter in the Cincinnati Masters last August, when the Serbian retired in the second set. And then went on to beat Rafael Nadal in the final of the US Open.

They’re out on court at: 8.30am.

I’ve been in the office since: 5am.

The first email. In this minute-by-minute anyway. “Multi-talented,” says Clare Davies, grossly overestimating my cricket knowledge. I think you are right and Djokovic will win but hopefully Murray (with his new Ivan face on) will put up a good fight. I’ll be keeping an eye on your coverage of this match whilst following Smyth on the OBO.”

Here’s more support for Murray. “I wholeheartedly agree with your comments on the dullards who moan about Murray’s performances in the recent majors,” says Craig McEwan in Pertgh. “I for one am encouraged by what I have seen so far from Melbourne and expect to see him do well tonight. He may not win this one, but he will be better and I expect him to win a major final this year. So there.” It makes sense that he will, but it also makes sense that he won’t. If that makes sense. To do so, he most likely has to play the perfect match – twice.

Those of you who joined me for the cricket earlier will have seen my broadside against cardigans.This cardigan was the beginning of the end for Federer,” says Dominic Cole. Someone lost it with me last year for saying Federer would never win another slam. He hasn’t since then and he won’t from here.

More pre-match emails.

“Haven’t you got this the wrong way round?” says Jonathan Blaney. “Murray is the beneficiary of the massive increase in standards in men’s tennis, which has produced three of the greatest players playing at the same time. Affluence, ease of travel, and the proliferation of tennis academies for young players must have contributed to this leap in quality. I’m not denying Murray’s talent, but he grew up at a time when it could be developed in a Scottish teenager and allow him to go to Barcelona for coaching. If he’d been born 20 years earlier would this have happened? It is Murray’s fortune to be playing at this time, but that fortune is also shared by others with extraordinary natural talent.” No. It’s ifs, buts and maybes, but he would surely have won a grand slam by now if he’d been playing 10 years ago. Let’s say, for example, the 2001 Wimbledon.

“Andy Murray can look forward to an upset on the cards Indian Cricket team is playing on Day 5 tomorrow – the first time this series,” says Krishna Moorthy. “So anything can happen if Murray loses to Djoker (as expected) he can take solace in the fact he does not have to meet him at Adelaide, Sydney and Perth.”

“I completely agree that Murray is generally brilliant but he has to be judged on his own standards,” says Niall Mullen. “He hasn’t really turned up in any of the 3 slam finals against players he has beaten many times. Whenever Greg Norman blew a major chance no-one doubted his talent just his nerve keeping ability. It’s legitimate to ask the same questions of the otherwise superb tennis player Andy Murray.” True. Though it’s worth pointing out he had nothing left in the tank in 2009 when he reached the US Open final. The big disappointment, more so than last year given what Djokovic went on to achieve, was the defeat to Federer here in 2010.

“Murray will get slaughtered tonight if he plays as badly as he did Wednesday,” notes Andrew Webb. “His serving was really, really, really bad. I reckon Murray will be lucky to win a grand slam – but purely down to bad luck in terms of his timing.” The only glimmer of hope there is that Djokovic’s serving against Ferrer was also dismal.

Fight! Fight! Fight! “What is Jonathan Blainey on about?” blasts Guy Hornsby. “Murray should be glad because coaching is better? Judy Murray was the first reason – long before Barcelona – that both he and his brother were playing tennis. Reading what I have about her, I’d have expected her to have done the same in the 70s or 80s. And since when has a first class seat on a plane dictated players being better? What absolute nonsense. Murray is a craftsman in an era of power players and in any era since Borg/McEnroe retired before Federer he’d have a couple of slams. But there’s still time, a few years yet, and I think he’ll do it.”

Mats Wilander reckons Djokovic is nervous. And that Murray is nervous. We’ll see. He also reckons Murray will win in five sets. He’ll have to get a lot of those tennis shots over the net if he wants to! Do some really good tennis and he’ll be fine is what I’m saying.

The players come out to a rocking ovation. There’s big support for Djokovic in the crowd, though there are a fair few Scottish flags dotted around the stadium. “Yesterday I sneaked out of my office(at home) to watch the entire match,” says Anthony O Connell. Today I will check in on it the odd bit here with you, that’s the difference in class as far as I’m concerned. My prediction is Novak in 3 comfortable sets and then he will do the same to Nadal.”

The toss. No idea who won it, but it was tails. Andrew Castle spoke over it. Thanks BBC!

Tok! Tok! Tokity Tok! The players are knocking up now. “I need to play patient tennis and hit my shots at the right time,” says Murray.

John Blom is the umpire. He tells the players they’ve got one more minute. “That was a lovely Simpsons quote earlier,” says Kevin Comber. ” I think this one fits nicely also if Andy went seeking support from his father after yet another Semi-Final Defeat. Bart/Andy: ‘You make me sick, Homer (Murray Senior)! You’re the one who told me I could be the best at anything if I just put my mind to it.’ Homer/Murray Senior: ‘Well, now that you’re a little bit older, I can tell you that’s a crock! No matter how good you are at something, there’s always about a million (or three in this case) people better than you!’”

First set: Djokovic* 1-0 Murray (* denotes server): Here we go then. Hold on to your hats, it could be a rocky ride. Djokovic opens the serving – he won the toss, I assume – and Murray hits a forehand long off the first serve. The next rally lasts far longer, before Djokovic booms a forehand down the line and Murray’s backhand drifts past the baseline again. Djokovic goes 40-0 up, but Murray gives himself a little bit of encouragement, easing himself into the match as the favourite fires into the net. Not that it makes a great deal of difference, as Murray then hits wide. An easy hold for Djokovic then. “I’m most looking forward to the hilarious shouts of “come on Tim” and the perpetual myth that he’s British when he wins and Scottish when he loses,” says Jamie Waterson. “Should be a brilliant match though and here’s hoping it will be a Murray win.”

First set: Djokovic 1-1 Murray*: It’s crucial that Murray gets off to a good start. The feeling is that he needs to win the first set to stand any chance, especially given the way he sometimes lets adversity affect him. But Djokovic is well on top, dominating almost every point from the off. Before Murray knows it, he’s 0-30 down, Djokovic’s defence forcing errors to creep into his game. Though he wins the next point with a superb backhand down the line, he quickly gives up two break points with a poor drop-shot that Djokovic easily reads. He’s at the net as quick as a flash, dinks one back and Murray can only hit wide. Murray rescues the first break point with a strong second serve into Djokovic’s body and then the second as Djokovic widly hammers a forehand wide. Murray then hangs on in the next point and Djokovic eventually drills a backhand long. What follows is then brilliant, the pair of them absolutely welting the ball back and forth over the net and with neither man on top, Djokovic blinks first and can’t beat the net with a forehand. A huge hold for Murray.

First set: Djokovic* 2-1 Murray: The standard of play and the pace of this match is already frightening. Djokovic begins this game with a pinpoint backhand winner that lands plum on the baseline; Murray follows up with a booming backhand of his own to bring it back to 15-all. Djokovic then misses a backhand by a whisker, offering Murray a little chance at 15-30, only for the Scot to overcook a forehand on second serve. But Murray’s now given Djokovic to think about after that whirlwind start, and the world No1 completely misjudges a forehand, running into it too early and skewing it well long to give Murray his first break point. Djokovic rescues himself with a big second serve down the middle though, and Murray can only block his forehand into the net. An ace gets him out of a sticky situation, and Murray then lands a backhand long. This is fascinatingly poised. Both players have had break points, but none have been taken. Yet. This could be a classic. “I have always had sympathy for Andy Murray because the seeding has meant he has always had to beat both Federer and Nadal to win a major,” says Ken Danbury. “I know others had to as well but because he always had to meet them in succession, usually semi and final, that was a big ask. Anyway, we’ll see. Djorky can’t have another year like last year, can he?”

First set: Djokovic 3-1 Murray*: Oh dear. This was a poor game from Murray, which hands Djokovic an early advantage. This is not an opponent who needs free gifts like Murray offered up here. At 15-all, he came into the net and got his backhand volley all wrong, dropping it meekly into the net. He gets it back to 30-all, but is quickly facing a break point – and at the worst possible moment, he serves up a double fault. The response from Murray will be interesting now.

First set: Djokovic* 3-2 Murray: And here’s the instant response from Murray! Djokovic is not firing on all cylinders yet and he can’t close the game out, a double fault bringing it back to deuce. Murray loses the next point however, and then complains to the umpire about an unsteady screen in the background unsettling him, drawing a cry of “Come on princess!” from the crowd. Isn’t that charming? Sometimes Murray lets outside factors affect him, but not here and he stays with Djokovic, who hands him a break point with an awful high volley into the net, a shot that simply had to be put away. He’s already wasted one break point in the previous game, but there’s no reprieve for Djokovic this time. Murray’s huge hitting has him well in control of the point, and he seizes the opportunity with a glorious backhand winner into the left corner. As I said, this could be a classic. He simply must hold now. Djokovic is livid with himself for letting that slip away. “This ‘any other era and he’d have won several majors’ really is loser talk,” says Niall Mullen. “He’s in this era so get on with it. It’s also pretty unlikely that Doc Brown is going to DeLorean him back to a time when Jim Courrier was world no.1.” It’s not loser talk, it’s merely acknowledgement of the outstanding levels the top three, never seen before in the game, have reached.

First set: Djokovic 4-2 Murray*: But he can’t hold. In a grand slam semi-final, it’s not good enough from Murray. Two dreadful backhands, one into the net and one so far wide it was almost out of the stadium gives Djokovic three break points and he only needs one as Murray whacks a forehand into the net. That’s unforgivable from Murray. He doesn’t need to make it this easy for Djokovic.

First set: Djokovic* 5-2 Murray: At 0-15, Djokovic curves an ace down the middle, a serve that’s so good even the line judge can’t get out of the way. Though she’s not hurting as much as Murray right now: he slams a forehand into the right corner and hurtles into the net, so Djokovic just whips an unstoppable forehand past him and into the open court. He closes out the game with a second ace. As ever, Murray is very good, but Djokovic is better. At the moment, it’s rather difficult to see how Murray can win this match. Murray goes back to his chair and asks for an ice towel. That’s not going to be enough.

First set: Djokovic 5-3 Murray*: Murray at least makes Djokovic serve for the set. A correct challenge from him after a huge forehand into the right corner gives him a 30-15 lead and from there it turns into a rather surprisingly simple game, Djokovic hitting a few yards wide with a backhand down the line to hand it to Murray. Now he has to break. Well, he’s already done it once.

Djokovic wins the first set 6-3: Someone have a word with the BBC – I think they’ve put a repeat on by mistake. At 15-all, Murray has a presentable chance to edge ahead in the game, but his cross-court forehand lands wide. Would Djokovic have missed? It’s unlikely. Djokovic then drags him out wide again, forcing Murray to go for a big winner, and a forehand into the net gives Djokovic two set points. He only needs one, racing into the net to punch a volley into the right corner that Murray can do nothing with. Come on Tim! “It’s really the top 3 can beat anyone, then Murray who can beat anyone except the top 3 then the rest who can pretty much beat anyone except the top 3 and Murray,” says Anthony O Connell. “It’s like 3 leagues!”

Second set: Djokovic 6-3, 1-0 Murray*: What’s the French for deja-vu? Djokovic has an answer for everything Murray presents him with and he’s broken again to take a commanding lead. It’s almost like he snuck into his hotel room and had a peek at his gameplan last night*. At 30-all, Murray plays a drop-shot that would be enough against most players, but Djokovic speeds forward, drills a forehand over to put Murray on the defensive, and his attempted lob lands long. Murray hands Djokovic the game with a tame backhand into the net. Which idiot said this was going to be a classic?

Legal disclaimer: The Guardian is not claiming that Novak Djokovic snuck into Andy Murray’s hotel room last night.

Second set: Djokovic* 6-3, 2-0 Murray: Murray simply makes too many errors when he gives himself a slight opening, a useless forehand into the net at 15-30 letting Djokovic off. He then wonks a backhand wide, the errors continuing to mount up, and after a long rally, a lazy backhand drops long. From 15-30, he just stood aside and allowed Djokovic to win three easy points. “While not taking a stance on the cardigan question, I do like to see the tennis players dressed properly in whites,” says Clare Davies. “Djokovic deserves to win not just for playing better tennis, but because he is dressed properly. Murray looks a shambles in his red and blue. It’s like having a Test player on the same field as an ODI-er and I know which I prefer!”

Second set: Djokovic 6-3, 2-1 Murray*: From the sublime to the ridiculous from Murray. He goes 0-30 down quickly, and rescues that situation with some huge serves, including an ace, to go 40-30 up. Having seemingly quelled the danger, he then picks the worst possible time to double fault, and let Djokovic back into it. Murray’s crumbling forehand then continues to let him down, and he slaps one into the net to give Djokovic a break point. Surprisingly he fails to take it though, an apparently simple forehand going wide, and Murray comes up with an ace and then seals the game as Djokovic casually plonks a drop-shot into the net. That should serve as a kick up the backside for Murray, who was threatening to let the game just drift away from him without anything even resembling a fight. “Just to mention that Wilander thought after the 1st set yesterday Federer was going to win,” says Tony. “Not always good to listen to him in predictions. So far not the best record.”

Second set: Djokovic* 6-3, 2-2 Murray: Maybe this will wake him up! Murray sends a laser-guided backhand deep into the left corner and when Djokovic lifts it back up, Murray is quickly at the net and rattles a Pete Sampras style overhead away to go 0-15 up. He then produces a similar backhand that has Djokovic falling all over himself to reach it, and Murray again puts the overhead away to go 0-30 up. What a chance this is. But then, what a player Djokovic is. A brilliant forehand that lands right on the line stops Murray and as if that wasn’t enough, an impossibly good backhand down the line somehow clips the outside edge of the line. Murray challenges it, but in vain. The pair then duke it out some more, Djokovic throwing in a double fault at 40-30 for good measure, before an incredible point. Murray should have lost it, but his defence was, well, Djokovic-esque, as he managed to return an overhead from the Serb and eventually flick an exceptional cross-court backhand past Djokovic to bring it back to deuce. When Murray’s backhand is on song, he has a chance and it sparkles again as he places a backhand past a statuesque Djokovic for a break point. He can’t take the first, but quickly gets another. Djokovic throws everything at him in a bid to win the point, but Murray strains to reach every shot, get it back and finally, at long last, Djokovic sends a shot past the baseline. Murray has broken back! We’ve got a game on our hands again, just as it looked like it was becoming a procession.

Second set: Djokovic 6-3, 2-3 Murray*: The crowd appears to be with Murray, mainly because he’s showing great fighting qualities. When he fizzes a forehand past Djokovic to go 15-0 up, they respond with a huge cheer. At 30-15, a stretching Djokovic can’t reach a booming serve down the middle, and though he gets the next one back over the net, Murray, now with all the bristling energy of a hyperactive toddler, is there to smash it away. I say!

Second set: Djokovic* 6-3, 2-4 Murray: Is this the work of a choker? Or is it the work of a marvellous tennis player? At the moment, it’s decidedly the latter. Djokovic crashes a forehand down the line, and Murray responds by whacking one from right to left and past a flailing Djokovic. He then lures Djokovic into the net and the passing shot is judged to perfection, Murray taking a 0-30 lead. Problem is, there’s another marvellous tennis player on the other side of the net, and faced with a challenge, two cracking forehands into the left corner from Djokovic haul him level. But not for long! This is now an outstanding match, each point packed with astonishing shotmaking. Djokovic can’t quite shake Murray off at 30-all, and eventually fires into the net to give up a break point. Can he take it? You bet, as Djokovic, now feeling the strain, sends a backhand long. From 2-0 down, Murray has won four games in a row.

Second set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-4 Murray*: This is a fantastic match. I know I keep saying it, but it bears repeating. At 0-15, Djokovic tries a drop-shot, trying to bring Murray out of his comfort zone. No dice, Murray reads it and just dinks a forehand winner away. A timely ace gives him a 30-15 lead, but then there’s a reminder of what Djokovic can do, a backhand on the rise pummelled away after a short forehand from Murray. And then a disaster for Murray, as he flicks an easy forehand wide to give Djokovic a break point. He can’t take the first after another smashing point, but gives Djokovic another chance with a double fault and this time there’s no escape as he hits a forehand into the net. He was ahead, but now the momentum is back with Djokovic. If he loses this match, this will be where he lost it. This set has now lasted 50 minutes. The first set was 47 minutes.

Second set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-5 Murray: What’s going on? Everyone’s serve has gone to pieces. At 0-15, Djokovic, the world No1, serves a double fault which, if nothing else, will delight Rafael Nadal. A cat-and-mouse rally follows, both players slowing the pace for a while, and Murray ends it by knocking a backhand into the net. A bizarre sequence follows. Djokovic arrows a briliant forehand into the right corner, which Murray somehow lobs back. For some reason, Djokovic just wandered over and instead of putting it away, he let Murray back into the rally, eventually losing it and giving up two break points. There are some weird moments in Djokovic matches. He saves the first, a shot from Murray clipping the top of the net and agonisingly landing on his side – and then exactly the same thing happens to Djokovic! Murray will now serve for the second set. “Apologies for having missed out on the earlier fashion discussion,” says Fashion’s Hadley Freeman. “I was, to be blunt, asleep. But I am very pleased that the sports liveblogs have been well and truly turned into fashion forums, and I am especially pleased at the strength of fashion opinions among the Guardian sports community. On the subject of a mauve cardigan, I think I shall refrain from commenting.” It looks a bit like this.

Murray wins the second set 6-3 to make it 1-1 in sets: Now Murray has to carry out the impossible: hold. Good luck with that – two bad errors, two shots into the net, give Djokovic two break points. First serves please! He rescues the first, crunching an ace down the middle and then the second, Djokovic letting him off with a wayward forehand that goes wide. Now Djokovic is puffing away, particularly after a wild forehand that goes long that brings up set point for Murray. And would you believe it, he takes it, Murray booming a fierce serve that Djokovic can’t return. Wow. Murray was 2-0 down at the start of this set, was close to going 3-0 down and now look! Choker? There’s your choker. As a treat, here’s an in-game gallery.

Third set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 1-0 Murray: Djokovic probably wasn’t expecting this – we’ve become so accustomed to Murray disappearing after setbacks in these games, but not this time. Even if he loses, it’s just great to see him playing to his potential against the best player in the world. There’s no let-up from Murray at the start of this set either. At 30-all, Djokovic, increasingly fatigued, flashes a backhand wide to give Murray a break point. The rally goes to and fro, but Djokovic stops it, claiming a backhand from went long. If he’s wrong, the game goes to Murray, but he’s right and he hangs in there. Djokovic glares at the umpire. He’s not happy out there, and Murray’s making all the running now, quickly getting another break point as Djokovic hits a forehand into the net. An awesome forehand down the line from Djokovic is too good for Murray though. Another backhand into the net isn’t though. A third break point for Murray. Third time lucky? No, Murray unable to withstand three smashes from Djokovic. A fourth chance goes begging. So does a fifth, Djokovic finding the line with an immense forehand. Incredibly Djokovic holds. That could prove pivotal. “Those first two sets look to have taken more out of Djokovic than Murray,” says Adam Hirst. “He looks tired out there. Murray looks slightly less so, despite always looking tired. He’s fresher.” Spot on there, Adam, but you never know what’s really going on with Djokovic.

Third set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 1-1 Murray*: That last game was punishing stuff, lasting nearly 15 minutes. Not least for me. But wouldn’t you know it, having wasted five break points in the last game, Murray lets his concentration slip on his serve. He goes 15-30 down, but two big first serves allow him to backhand and forehand winners away. Murray then polishes it off, wrongfooting Djokovic with a disguised forehand winner into the right corner. “There is no shame in losing tennis matches to players who are better than you and it must be somewhat annoying for him to have this choker tag thrown in his face whenever he loses to one of them,” says Niall Howarth. “But what can he do he’s probably got a team of psychologists who forbid him from saying out loud, ‘It’s not my fault they’re just better than me.’ But they are and there’s no shame in that!”

Third set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 1-2 Murray: Djokovic could do with an easy hold here. He hasn’t had one since the first game of the second set. He’s not going to get it though. At 0-15, Murray whacks a forehand deep into the left corner and then cushions a delicate volley away. The increasingly sloppy Djokovic then blocks a backhand long to give Murray three break points. Murray wastes the first two in sloppy fashion, but Djokovic can’t rescue a third. Murray thumps a forehand to the left, a tactic that is bringing him great rewards, and then puts the smash away. This match, it goes without saying, is there for the taking. But don’t be stupid enough to write off Novak Djokovic. It’s far from over. “Wow, Hadley Freeman slumming it on the sports pages,” says Niall Mullen. “Does that mean if we talk politics Polly Toynbee will e-mail in?”

Third set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 2-2 Murray*: An immediate chance for Djokovic to break back, as Murray, off-balance, puts a forehand wide to give him two break points. Typically enough, Murray lands a backhand long and Djokovic is back in it. “Hi there, amazingly I’m still awake and following this match and the cricket, and I have to point out that as neither Murray nor Djoko are South African, the tag of choker cannot be applied to either,” says Clare Davies. “At risk of cross-contaminating GU sporting threads, I am tempted to sign off this email with #endofexclamationmark.” #STOPHASHTAGS

Third set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 3-2 Murray: Gorgeous. Murray races into the net after an aggressive return and then touches a cute backhand volley over the net for 0-15. A double-fault from Djokovic, who looks so despondent, gives Murray another glimmer. It seems like Djokovic is 0-30 down on every service game – they might as well just play it from there. Sloppy play from Murray allows Djokovic to get it back to 40-30 though. Which is the cue for him to rediscover his previous fluidity and bring it to deuce with a clever forehand. More slackness from Djokovic gives Murray a break point – how many times has that been written so far – but he mistimes a simple forehand into the net. From there, Djokovic holds. Every game is like a five-set match in their own right.

Third set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 3-3 Murray*: Some of Djokovic’s effort to reach lost causes is amazing. It doesn’t always come off, but still, what stamina and speed. I suppose it puts doubts in Murray’s mind, reminds him that every shot needs to be perfect. Murray holds convincingly enough, though there were two wonderful backhand returns from Djokovic here. “Thanks to Hadley Freeman,” says Richard Cawley. “I’ve just ordered and sent the mauve cardigan to Andy. I added a note to say that Ivan can wear it for the final, if he himself doesn’t wish to. That should put Rafa off his stride either way.”

Third set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 4-3 Murray: Djokovic reacts to an ace as if he’d won the whole tournament. Well done Novak! Well done, you’ve done an ace. There’s no such shenanigans from Murray though after a monstrous forehand winner down the line for 15-30. This time he can’t eke out a break point though, another ace from Djokovic the highlight of the game. Suddenly he looks like he’s gathered himself. Will Murray regret not taking his chances at the start of this set?

Third set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 4-4 Murray*: Now it’s Murray’s turn to go 0-30 down on his serve. The pendulum is swinging back in Djokovic’s favour. Djokovic lets him off though – at 15-30, he mistimes his backhand return off a soft second serve. Murray regains his equilibrium and pushes a backhand winner into the right corner, and then wins the game after a storming rally with a forehand into the opposite side. Neither man is giving an inch now. What a match.

Third set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 5-4 Murray: An extraordinary slice of luck for Murray on the first point! Djokovic blows the chance to put a forehand away and as the point drags on, a forehand from Murray flicks off the top of the net and deflects past Djokovic, who couldn’t adjust. At deuce, Murray gets pulled out wide and tries to play a backhand winner down the line, but finds the net instead. That was a tired shot. Djokovic closes the game out with an ace and now Murray has to serve to stay in a set he probably should have won by now. “My dad, a non sports fan is over in Melbourne at the moment visiting family,” says Alex Warwick. “He’s currently watching this game and has just texted his joy at finally understanding why I’ve been wasting my life watching sport for the past 30 years.”

Third set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 5-5 Murray*: This is a different Djokovic now – the Djokovic we saw in the first set. He opens up this game by running around the ball and knocking an unplayable forehand down the line. But this is also a different Murray to the one we saw in the first set and he responds to that setback with two big serves to go 30-15 up. Djokovic then forces an error from Murray with another forehand down the line and then earns a set point, Murray firing a forehand long. Not the worst time for Murray to serve up an ace out wide then. It’s not long before he’s facing another break point though, a lob not good enough to beat Djokovic. Not the worst time for Murray to come up with a brilliant wide forehand on to the line then. But the pressure is starting to tell: Murray doesn’t quite catch a volley right, and then puts an overhead backhand into the net to give Djokovic a third chance. Again he rescues it though – and what a time to play a drop-shot! Djokovic gets it back over the net, but Murray is there win the point with a backhand down the line. Djokovic then misjudges a serve from Murray, and Murray gets lucky with two net cords, the second enough to cause Djokovic to knock a backhand well wide. This is gruelling, gutsy stuff.

Third set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 5-6 Murray: And now it’s Djokovic’s turn to come under pressure, neat backhand returns from Murray giving him a 15-30 lead. Murray then goes toe-to-toe with Djokovic, trading shots from the back of the court, waiting for his opening and then bringing up two break points with a fabulous forehand winner. He wastes the first, taking a backhand a bit too early and sending it into the net. But then the stadium erupts as Murray summons up all his defensive powers, hangs on to Djokovic’s coat-tails and waits for the Serbian to slice a backhand past the baseline. I’m not making this up: Andy Murray will now serve for the third set. “The weather here in Melbourne is very oppressive,” says Neill Brown. “I am in my flat, barely a mile a way from Rod Laver Arena and there is no breeze at all; the temperature is 26c with 60% humidity. Even from the comfort of my balcony overlooking the Yarra river (yeah, I’m showing off but I was born and grew up in Watford so I’m sure you can forgive me), I’m uncomfortably warm. Given that the court has none of these comforts, the physical effort being made by both players should not be underestimated right now; lesser men would have thrown in the towel at least an hour ago.”

Third set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-6 Murray: Will Murray’s nerve hold? One thing’s for sure, Djokovic isn’t about to make it easy for him. At 15-0, he yoinks Murray into the net and then plays a perfect backhand lob over him. And Murray won’t make it easy for himself either, as his tiredness betrays him with a double-fault, before he rams a forehand way long to give Djokovic two chances to break back. The first goes begging, Djokovic pulling a cross-court forehand wide, as confirmed by a challenge, but he can’t rescue two: Djokovic gets a good length on a forehand to catch Murray off-guard and his backhand goes wide. This is pure agony. For the players as well, not just me.

Third set tie-break: Djokovic* 0-1 Murray: First blood to Murray in the tie-break, as Djokovic slices a backhand into the net.

Third set tie-break: Djokovic 1-1 Murray*: Unbelievable. The mini-break is eroded as Djokovic just comes out on top at the net, forcing Murray to eventually hit long.

Third set tie-break: Djokovic 1-2 Murray*: A bouncer from Murray fools Djokovic, whose backhand goes long.

Third set tie-break: Djokovic* 1-3 Murray: Djokovic double-faults!

Third set tie-break: Djokovic* 2-3 Murray: Murray whacks a dire forehand long, but he still has the mini-break.

Third set tie-break: Djokovic 3-3 Murray*: Too good from Djokovic, whose backhand volley at the net is enough to beat Murray.

Third set tie-break: Djokovic 3-4 Murray*: Murray needed an ace here. He got an ace. Over to you, Novak.

Third set tie-break: Djokovic* 3-5 Murray: A brilliant return of serve from Murray, and Djokovic slices long!

Third set tie-break: Djokovic* 3-6 Murray: Murray dominates an astonishing rally, and finally manages to wrongfoot Djokovic with a forehand into the right-hand corner! He now has three set points, two on his own serve.

Third set tie-break: Djokovic 4-6 Murray*: You’d expect nothing less. Djokovic overpowers Murray, moves into the net and then casually beats him with a forehand.

Murray wins the third set 7-6 to lead 2-1 in sets! Murray plays a forehand out wide, and Djokovic, on the stretch, sends a cross-court forehand wide! Phew! How long was that third set? 90 minutes? I’ve been up since 4.30am, but I’m not as tired as these two must be. Andy Murray is now a set away from beating Novak Djokovic. What a turnaround.

Fourth set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 6-7 1-0 Murray*: A two-second toilet break for me, and we’re back. At 15-30, Murray brings some expletives out of your reporter by thrashing a forehand volley well long. What on earth was he playing at there? Two break points. The first is saved, though he nearly mucks up another overhead; Djokovic’s scavenging is out of this world. Murray can’t save the second one though, his forehand going long. That was loose. Murray now knows what he’s going to have to do to close this out. “That was absolutely epic,” says Fraser Thomas. “People who don’t like sport have no soul.”

Fourth set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-7 2-0 Murray: Back in his hotel, Rafael Nadal is watching this all unfolf, and having a wee chuckle. This monstrous match only suits him. Djokovic holds to love. Is that the first time that’s happened in the entire match?

Fourth set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 3-0 Murray*: Epic? That doesn’t cover it. We’re going to need to invent a new word for this match the way it’s going. Murray’s going through a little slump at the moment though, giving Djokovic a chance for a double-break with a long forehand. Sure enough, Djokovic takes it, Murray pulling a two-handed backhand wide. It looks like it’s going to a fifth. Ebb and flow, ebb and flow. “Last time I emailed I was stuck backstage at the kings head theatre trying to follow the Wimledon final, now I’m stuck on lunch duty in a primary school,” says Cameron Harris. “Why can’t Murray organise his schedule around the times of good, hard working, ordinary citizens who as a point of principle dont take any work that pays more than minimum wage? Thats modern sportsmen for you. Out of touch.”

Fourth set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 4-0 Murray: Another hold to love for Djokovic, who’s now coming up with aces with increasing regularity. Murray looks like he’s giving this set up. “What does Unfolf mean?” smarms William Brown, who finds typos in a report that’s been going since 7.30am to be the most hilarious thing in the world.

Fourth set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 4-1 Murray*: Murray gets on the scoreboard in this set, holding to 15. Djokovic still has a double-break though. “Who’ll be celebrating,” says Sean Turner. “After that set, Nadal.”

Fourth set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 5-1 Murray: Maybe he’s not ready to let go just yet. He wins his first point on Djokovic’s serve for the first time in this set with a swinging volley to go 0-15 up, and then a Djokovic error makes it 15-30. All of a sudden, it’s Djokovic making the errors, and a wide backhand gives Murray two break points. He can’t take either though, two backhands dropping apologetically into the net. “Easy!” bellows Murray. Less of that, please. Just move on. From there, Djokovic closes out the game, swatting a cross-court Murray forehand back into the wide open court. “Murray cannot give away the momentum now because he won’t get it back,” says Anthony O Connell. “You can’t switch off for a set and then switch back on.”

Djokovic wins the fourth set 6-1 to make it 2-2 in sets: We’re going to a fifth. Ferocious hitting from Djokovic, including an imperious backhand return, gives him a 0-30 lead, and he then earns three set points with a forehand down the line. Murray’s barely moving now, and Djokovic needs just one chance, smashing a backhand return down the line to level it up. That set took 25 minutes; the third took 88.

Fifth set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 1-0 Murray: This is the biggest set of Murray’s career to date. To mark it, he’s had a change of shirt. He’s now wearing white, just like Djokovic. I wouldn’t want to be in charge of handling the one he’s taken off. At 40-0, Djokovic serves up a double-fault and for reasons best left to him, decides to challenge the second serve. What’s the point of that?

Fifth set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 1-1 Murray*: Come at the king, best not miss. Djokovic has reacted to Murray taking the second and third sets with utmost disdain, almost affronted that anyone might dare test him to such an extent. In that context, this is an almighty hold for Murray, especially as he had to come back from 0-15. He closes it out with an ace. Djokovic is rampant, but this is terrific spirit from Murray.

Fifth set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 2-1 Murray: Murray’s rediscovered a little bit of his swagger now, and will be encouraged to hear Djokovic grunting as he hits the ball. There hasn’t been much of that since the start of the fourth set. At 30-15, the pair duke it out from the baseline, before Murray chips a drop-shot over. Djokovic gets there, Murray lobs him, Djokovic gets back, and then knocks a forehand wide. It’s not enough to properly threaten Djokovic’s serve though. But Andy Murray has decided to join in again.”I just started following for the fourth set and feel like it’s my fault,” says Jonah Chris Chesterman. It’s not over yet, Chris.

Fifth set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 2-2 Murray*: These are crucial moments, as the butterflies in my stomach are letting me know. Sure enough, Djokovic earns a break point, pinpoint ground strokes pulling Murray about all over the place – but Murray sends a rocket of a serve down the middle to rescue it. Djokovic has two more opportunites to break Murray, but if ever there was a time for Murray to start pounding down first serves, this is it. He holds. Just. “Another nice “Wire” quote Jacob, but if I dare be pretentious enough to stick in another and also stick my neck out on a result of this game, ‘The King stay the King’,” offers Kevin Comber.

Fifth set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 3-2 Murray: Djokovic holds to love, wrapping up the game with a backhand down the line that you can only really stand back and applaud. Murray is making no inroads into his serve now. Djokovic is relentless when he’s returning. There’s only so much Murray can take before he cracks.

Fifth set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 4-2 Murray*: There might not be a way back from this. Murray saves a break point at 30-40 – or rather, Djokovic misses a forehand pass at 30-40 – but it’s not long before he’s facing another. Once again, his inability to kill off a point comes back to haunt him. It was there to be won after Djokovic hung a defensive shot up, the ball just begging to be smashed away. But Murray let it drop, and once Djokovic was back in the point, a miscue from Murray gave him the chance to finish it off with a killer forehand.

Fifth set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 5-2 Murray: Murray’ gone. Djokovic holds to love and this gladitorial contest is not going to get the barnstorming ending it deserves. Djokovic is now a game away.

Fifth set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 5-3 Murray*: He couldn’t, could he? Murray holds and the crowd’s rapturous reception to that tells you all you need to know. “As I said you can not switch off for a set and hope to turn it back on, but I’m hoping for the miracle of sport for him!” says Anthony O Connell. “Last 14 games he’s only won three games and that tells its own story.”

Fifth set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 5-4 Murray: Serving for the match, Djokovic finds himself broken to love! Murray kept on fighting, dominating the first point with massive hitting to go 0-15 up. Suddenly Djokovic is feeling a little tight, and nervously sends a backhand into the net to make it 0-30. Murray then puts absolutely everything into a stupendous forehand, smashing it into the left corner to earn three break points! He seizes the moment, and when a volley from Djokovic falls into the middle of the court, he rams a forehand back past him. What more is this barmy match going to throw at us?

Fifth set: Djokovic 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 5-5 Murray*: Murray uses language of the industrial nature when, as he’s waiting serve, someone chucks a ball on to the court. It seems to throw him a little, and he loses the first point, slicing a forehand into the net after a shot from Djokovic landed on the baseline. He thought it was out. But he wins the next three points though. What a competitor. The crowd loves him. They love him! This is never going to end, is it?

Fifth set: Djokovic* 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 6-5 Murray: The fans are completely with Murray now. And who could blame them? Djokovic loses the first point, hitting wide with a backhand and is then incredibly lucky not to go 0-30 down when a lob from Murray is called long. It was so tight, but neither player has any challenges left. Murray doesn’t let it affect him though, and goes 15-30 up with a superb forehand winner. He’s in the zone, and incredibly he finds himself with two break points when Djokovic weakly sends a backhand into the net. The first comes to nothing, a forehand into the net, and after a monstrous 29-shot rally, Djokovic conjures a magical winner out of nowhere, an impossible forehand down the line. He’s quite pleased with himself after that, but he’s not out of the woods yet. Not at all, in fact, as he lazily sends a forehand long to give Murray a third break point, only for the Scot to hit the net with a backhand. Eventually Djokovic holds, winning the game with a forehand volley. This has the feel of Federer-Roddick in the Wimbledon final in 2009 about it.

Djokovic wins 6-3, 3-6, 6-7, 6-1, 7-5: You always felt it might end this way. The game slipped away from Murray when a questionable call went against him at 15-all, but having used up all his challenges, he couldn’t dispute it. A backhand into the net then gives Djokovic two match points, with the end in sight. He only needs one, opening up for a forehand from right to left that Murray somehow reaches and digs back over the net, only for Djokovic to place a forehand volley even out of his reach. Djokovic collapses. Djokovic collapses? How must Murray feel?

That was the best match since the Wimbledon final in 2008. Never again let it be said that Andy Murray is a choker. He pushed the world No1 all the way and no one could have complained if he’d won. He tried and he lost, but he’s not a failure. After that gargantuan effort, they both deserve a medal; instead Murray is on the next plane home and Djokovic has a final with Rafael Nadal. Thanks for reading and emailing. Bye.

guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

January 27 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »

Andy Murray backed to beat Novak Djokovic in Australian Open semi-final


Andy Murray’s coach, Ivan Lendl, puts positive spin on previous defeats as the Scot prepares to play for place in the final

If Andy Murray beats the odds and Novak Djokovic on Friday to reach the final of the Australian Open for the third year in a row – against his third different opponent, Rafael Nadal – he will go to battle with Ivan Lendl’s clear-cut rhetoric ringing in his ears. Anything is possible, is the new coach’s message.

Roger Federer beat Murray convincingly in 2010, Djokovic beat him badly in 2011 – and starts favourite to prevent him going any further when they go on to Rod Laver Arena (at 8.30am UK time) – but Old Stoneface, as Lendl must affectionately be known on his return to tennis, will not countenance negativity.

“The ranking says [Djokovic] is No1 so people think he can win,” he said on Thursday night. “I think anyone is beatable. If you don’t think anyone is beatable then you shouldn’t be playing. All the top guys – whether it’s Roger, who has won 16, or Rafa or Novak with his great year last year, or Andy – are good enough to win if you get enough opportunities.”

Nadal said after his sometimes breathtaking performance to put Federer out in Thursday’s semi-final: “I think Andy should be more aggressive if he wants to beat Novak — but maybe I don’t know, as I lost to him six times last year.”

Federer reckons “both are playing well enough to win this title”.

Nevertheless, it is at this point in a major when cynics less well-versed in the art of tennis than Nadal and Federer cast doubt on Murray’s psychological strength – and Lendl is quick to put in context the comparisons made between Murray (loser of his first three grand slam finals) and himself (loser of his first four).

“I totally disregard what was the perception of Andy – losing to Federer at the US Open, arguably the best player of all time, losing to him here and then losing to Novak. If instead of here, Andy had played that US Open against Novak, nobody would have criticised him because we couldn’t know at that time just how good Novak would become and the year he would have. Andy lost that final in three sets. It happens.

“Look at the quality of the opponents in his finals. It’s not as if he lost to someone ranked 10 in the world. Similar to me, I lost to [Bjorn] Borg on clay; he was winning his sixth French Open at that time and I was 21 years old. Actually, it was an upset I got to the finals. Then I played [Jimmy] Connors who had been in five Open finals, and here with Mats [Wilander] it was a little different because I didn’t know how to handle it on the grass [the Australian Open was played on grass until 1988]. I was coming in, he was staying back and I couldn’t hurt him and that was bad.”

Lendl has told one interviewer after another here the qualities that most attracted him to Murray were the Scot’s politeness and his work ethic. They might seem wildly unrelated but Lendl – like anyone who gets to know Murray – recognises in him a sincerity not always evident in elite athletes.

Murray’s good manners come from his basic honesty; if he can cope with constructive criticism from Lendl and respond by fine-tuning his game, he will improve.

“I think Andy has a lot to give and is willing to give all that it takes. You are only going to get out of it what you desire. I wouldn’t say I got everything I wanted out of my career but I wanted to win. You could always say, ‘I could have won that one and I could have won that one’ but if you have put the hard work in then you can have no regrets. I see a desire – the same desire I had. If you are focusing on why he hasn’t won, to my mind you are focusing on the wrong thing. There is a respect level that exists between us that is very special.”

As for beating Djokovic, that is the immediate mountain. The Serb has played some irresistible tennis yet there have been moments of vulnerability. He was angry with himself for slipping up briefly against Lleyton Hewitt; he has become so used to dominating opponents since that crushing win over Murray here a year ago that dropping a set to a fired-up local on one good leg was not acceptable.

In putting away the stubborn David Ferrer, he felt a brief, sharp pain in his left hamstring, then fell to his knees struggling for breath during the second-set tie-break.

Sources close to the Djokovic camp insist there is nothing to worry about.

We will know soon enough. If Lendl spots any sign of weakness in Djokovic on Friday, it is a racing certainty he will let Murray know with a nod, a wink or grimace that he must go for the kill. As Richard Baerlein, once of this parish said, now is the time to bet like men.

guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

January 27 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »

Andy Murray earns chance to turn the tables against Novak Djokovic


Britain’s world No4 is up for the fight against an old friend and in Ivan Lendl he has the perfect cornerman to help his cause

Andy Murray says he likes a fight. Well, he has got one against Novak Djokovic here on Friday night, one that will determine who contests the final of the 2012 Australian Open and leave the loser utterly spent.

This, though, is a physical confrontation with more at stake than a goblet. It provides Murray with a chance to erase the memory of his humiliation against the Serb here a year ago, a defeat that sent him into a brief spiral of despair from which he did well to emerge a stronger and better player.

On the eve of this tournament Murray sounded reborn when he said: “Win like a man, lose like a man,” a proposition still untested after five relatively straightforward wins and a single dropped set.

However, when he meets the world No1 in the second semi-final – his third in succession here and fifth in a row in majors – not only will they both be inspired by knowing the winner of the showdown between Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal on Thursday (8.30am GMT) and thus their prospective opponent in the final on Sunday but they will bring to the Rod Laver Arena a raw aggression neither has been required to show fully the past week or so.

Before the quarter-finals Murray had beaten a feisty American teenager, Ryan Harrison, given up only 15 games against the elegant but ultimately outclassed Frenchmen Edouard Roger-Vasselin and Michaël Llodra and had the luxury of a 49-minute retirement win over the 92nd‑ranked Mikhail Kukushkin. They were mere spars. On Wednesday it was the turn of the promising Kei Nishikori who, weighed down by a five-setter against Jo‑Wilfried Tsonga two days earlier, was left gasping after two hours and 12 minutes, hardly a marathon.

Murray won 6-3, 6-3, 6-1 and, apart from struggling with his service game and a cricked neck, hit some wicked groundstrokes, possibly as hard as he has struck a tennis ball in all his years as a professional.

Djokovic, meanwhile, has been pushed hardest after dropping a set against Lleyton Hewitt and looking physically distressed in his quarter-final on Wednesday against the Tour’s acknowledged bruiser, David Ferrer, before finishing him off 6-4, 7-6, 6-1 in 2hr 44min.

“It was just a sudden pain,” he said of pulling up quickly to tend his thigh. “I don’t have any physical issues. I feel very fit and I feel mentally, as well, very fresh.” There was also a worrying pause to catch his breath. “I found it difficult after a long time to breathe because I felt the whole day my nose was closed a little bit. I just wasn’t able to get enough oxygen.”

In the past few days Murray has spoken about the brutality of his sport, expressing no sympathy, for instance, for Tomas Berdych, who refused to shake hands with Nicolás Almagro after a fractious match in which the Spaniard belted a volley straight at him, knocking him on his backside.

“Like Almagro said after the match,” Murray wrote in his column in the Australian newspaper, “he was just trying to win the point.” Would he do the same to Djokovic, his friend since their early teens and with whom he played five-a-side before last year’s crushing encounter? “If it means hitting them with a passing shot like Almagro did with Berdych … you just have to do whatever you have to do.”

The Scot has always embraced the ugly demands of his sport but there would seem to be a connection between this newly expressed machismo and the arrival of Ivan Lendl, a stone-faced hard man who came from behind the old Iron Curtain to terrorise his peers and who, as a silent, brooding mentor, has the bedside manner of Dracula. “The reason for employing him was to give me an extra edge,” Murray said, “to have someone in my corner who has been through the same things. But it is always down to the player. It doesn’t matter what anybody says to you on the court.”

While Murray wants to bury some ghosts, he said: “You want to move on from what’s happened in the past but you also need to learn from it as well. I won’t be going to the match thinking about last year’s final. We’ll soon see whether I’ve closed the gap or not.”

One thing is certain: Murray has picked the right cornerman for this fight.

guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

January 26 2012 | Posted in Andy Murray News | Read More »